Persona review
Let named stakeholder perspectives review the same artifact independently before it enters a costly conversation.
What will each practical point of view object to?
A narrow job with a visible boundary
Use it on briefs, PRDs, proposals, and decisions that must survive engineering, design, business, or operational scrutiny.
Input
One artifact and either named perspectives or a document type from which relevant reviewers can be selected.
Outputs
- Independent perspective reviews
- Gut reactions and specific objections
- An optional revision pass against chosen feedback
Boundary
A persona is a reasoning lens, not a fabricated real stakeholder or evidence about an audience segment.
Invocation
humane:persona-review
See the decision change
A skeptical engineer checks feasibility, a UX designer checks task coherence, and an operator checks failure and ownership boundaries independently.
Different concerns remain attributable instead of blending into one voice.
1 / 2- Generic critique
Review this PRD.
A skeptical engineer checks feasibility, a UX designer checks task coherence, and an operator checks failure and ownership boundaries independently.
- Premature consensus
Summarize what all stakeholders agree on.
Show agreements, conflicts, and perspective-specific objections first. Revise only against the feedback the owner accepts.
Run the skill by name
Install the Humane pack once, then name this skill when the task reaches its boundary.
humane:persona-review